Chelsea are gearing up for a serious push to carry Marc Guehi again to Stamford Bridge this summer season, with the highly-rated England defender on the prime of their switch wishlist.
Crystal Palace stood agency in January, rejecting curiosity from Chelsea and a late bid from Tottenham, whereas Newcastle failed in a number of makes an attempt to signal Guehi final summer season.
Palace have valued their star centre-back at round £70 million, and with defensive reinforcements a precedence for Chelsea, they’re anticipated to make a critical transfer for the England worldwide in the summertime, experiences the Mirror.
“I used to be out PARTYING and slacking in coaching – I knew I wasn’t going to play anyway!” – which former Arsenal star regrets letting Wenger down?
One problem Chelsea have confronted in recent times is their wage construction. They’re providing longer contracts with decrease base salaries, however this has generally made it tough to compete for prime gamers. Nevertheless, Guehi is seen as a vital goal, and the membership can be reluctant to let a rival snap him up.
Having offered him to Palace for £18 million in 2021, the West London membership included an identical clause within the deal, giving them the precise to equal any provide from one other membership. A 20% sell-on clause was additionally inserted, although that might turn into difficult if Chelsea had been to purchase him again themselves.
Enzo Maresca on Marc Guehi forward of summer season hyperlinks
Talking about Guehi in January earlier than his aspect determined to recall Trevoh Chalobah from his mortgage at Palace, Maresca mentioned: “The one factor I can say is Marc Guehi is a Palace participant. I like Marc for certain however he’s not our participant.
“However I like additionally the central defenders now we have.I additionally like several types of central defenders in Italy, Spain and France however that doesn’t imply we’re going to purchase a participant.
“It’s a regular state of affairs I believe when you may have central defenders injured that the hypothesis is there. On the identical time, there may be nothing there.”